<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenRAW.org survey</title>
	<link>http://www.tigert.com/archives/2006/02/11/openraworg-survey/</link>
	<description>um, what do I write here?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JTL</title>
		<link>http://www.tigert.com/archives/2006/02/11/openraworg-survey/#comment-4648</link>
		<dc:creator>JTL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tigert.com/archives/2006/02/11/openraworg-survey/#comment-4648</guid>
		<description>Yes, I love freedom as much as any other guy - but if the difference in quality between the free tool (ufraw) and the only-free-as-in-free beer (raw shooter essential, running under wine) is THAT big, I have to admit that I fall for the dark side (at least as far as my photos go) :-).
I think that ufraw (or better dcraw) has a long way to go - and that's not in the UI department - to become comparable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I love freedom as much as any other guy - but if the difference in quality between the free tool (ufraw) and the only-free-as-in-free beer (raw shooter essential, running under wine) is THAT big, I have to admit that I fall for the dark side (at least as far as my photos go) :-).<br />
I think that ufraw (or better dcraw) has a long way to go - and that&#8217;s not in the UI department - to become comparable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
