<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gnome website and CMS questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tigert.com/2006/07/28/gnome-website-and-cms-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tigert.com/2006/07/28/gnome-website-and-cms-questions/</link>
	<description>um, what do I write here?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:17:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gergely Nagy</title>
		<link>http://www.tigert.com/2006/07/28/gnome-website-and-cms-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-22063</link>
		<dc:creator>Gergely Nagy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tigert.com/archives/2006/07/28/gnome-website-and-cms-questions/#comment-22063</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been playing with the idea for a while now to move desktop data into a repository style storage pool, that is perhaps in line with your CMS idea.

The main point is to have a self-contained data store that really &quot;owns&quot; the data, understands it, makes sure it is consistent, can establish relationships, can do queries, can manage versions, transactions, access control, notification, etc. It would be inherently distributed (i.e. networked and sync-able).

Think of CRUD [1] insted of POSIX read/write...

BTW I&#039;m involved with the www.gnome.org CMS selection process, it&#039;s nice to see it is getting more and more attention.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRUD_%28acronym%29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been playing with the idea for a while now to move desktop data into a repository style storage pool, that is perhaps in line with your CMS idea.</p>
<p>The main point is to have a self-contained data store that really &#8220;owns&#8221; the data, understands it, makes sure it is consistent, can establish relationships, can do queries, can manage versions, transactions, access control, notification, etc. It would be inherently distributed (i.e. networked and sync-able).</p>
<p>Think of CRUD [1] insted of POSIX read/write&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW I&#8217;m involved with the <a href="http://www.gnome.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnome.org</a> CMS selection process, it&#8217;s nice to see it is getting more and more attention.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRUD_%28acronym%29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRUD_%28acronym%29</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knipknap</title>
		<link>http://www.tigert.com/2006/07/28/gnome-website-and-cms-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-21938</link>
		<dc:creator>knipknap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tigert.com/archives/2006/07/28/gnome-website-and-cms-questions/#comment-21938</guid>
		<description>I am working on a CMS that aims to do the latter (integrating desktop services with the web), however, it is far from suited for gnome.org at the current status.

I have written a little about it in my blog only a couple of minutes ago:
&gt; http://debain.org/?p=124

Integrating with the desktop is also a very complex task, so I am not sure whether it is something that can already be considered in the website CMS.
Either way, I think integrating with the web is something that needs to be pushed very seriously. It adds lots of awesomeness to our applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on a CMS that aims to do the latter (integrating desktop services with the web), however, it is far from suited for gnome.org at the current status.</p>
<p>I have written a little about it in my blog only a couple of minutes ago:<br />
&gt; <a href="http://debain.org/?p=124" rel="nofollow">http://debain.org/?p=124</a></p>
<p>Integrating with the desktop is also a very complex task, so I am not sure whether it is something that can already be considered in the website CMS.<br />
Either way, I think integrating with the web is something that needs to be pushed very seriously. It adds lots of awesomeness to our applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
