<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On optimizing software for speed..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tigert.com/2006/01/27/on-optimizing-software-for-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tigert.com/2006/01/27/on-optimizing-software-for-speed/</link>
	<description>um, what do I write here?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:17:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Horkan</title>
		<link>http://www.tigert.com/2006/01/27/on-optimizing-software-for-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Horkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tigert.com/archives/2006/01/27/on-optimizing-software-for-speed/#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>*Just* Evolution, the Gimp and Firefox!

Those are some of the larger more resource hungry programs available.  
Throw in a few more like OpenOffice and you might just be able to grind you machine to an incredibly slow speed so that it is unusable.  I&#039;ve older hardware so perhaps I&#039;m more sensative but Gnome is definately far far slower than Windows 2000.   

You might also try running gimp --no-data
Gimp is simply not designed to be slim or fast by default, even if you were a proffessional user and kept it open all day it would be difficult to make use of it all the features even if you were trying, so I&#039;ve never though it was the best strategy and I wish they&#039;d just load things on demand as and when they are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Just* Evolution, the Gimp and Firefox!</p>
<p>Those are some of the larger more resource hungry programs available.<br />
Throw in a few more like OpenOffice and you might just be able to grind you machine to an incredibly slow speed so that it is unusable.  I&#8217;ve older hardware so perhaps I&#8217;m more sensative but Gnome is definately far far slower than Windows 2000.   </p>
<p>You might also try running gimp &#8211;no-data<br />
Gimp is simply not designed to be slim or fast by default, even if you were a proffessional user and kept it open all day it would be difficult to make use of it all the features even if you were trying, so I&#8217;ve never though it was the best strategy and I wish they&#8217;d just load things on demand as and when they are needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messe</title>
		<link>http://www.tigert.com/2006/01/27/on-optimizing-software-for-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-4334</link>
		<dc:creator>Messe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tigert.com/archives/2006/01/27/on-optimizing-software-for-speed/#comment-4334</guid>
		<description>Hi.

You propably knew this already but you could check your /proc/sys/vm value. Bigger the value is, more actively Linux swaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>You propably knew this already but you could check your /proc/sys/vm value. Bigger the value is, more actively Linux swaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
